Is Google better than the catalog?
Huh.
So I'm looking up journal articles. I've got the references--I'm just trying to get the text. So I start with the catalog.
No luck.
So I try FindText (our SFX server). Academic Search Premier has full text of the article, but only starting in 2003.
I'm looking for 2002.
So I Google the author--maybe she archived it herself.
I find her library, but no personal web page.
I add the first couple words of the title to the Google Search.
The first entry is a link to PubMedCentral, which has html and pdf full text of the article.
Would someone please tell me why I should keep using the library catalog to see if we have access to the full text of a given title?
So I'm looking up journal articles. I've got the references--I'm just trying to get the text. So I start with the catalog.
No luck.
So I try FindText (our SFX server). Academic Search Premier has full text of the article, but only starting in 2003.
I'm looking for 2002.
So I Google the author--maybe she archived it herself.
I find her library, but no personal web page.
I add the first couple words of the title to the Google Search.
The first entry is a link to PubMedCentral, which has html and pdf full text of the article.
Would someone please tell me why I should keep using the library catalog to see if we have access to the full text of a given title?
PLEASE NOTE: this is an extremely geeky post which will be of no interest to anyone that doesn't work in technical services. I apologize in advance to my other 3 readers.
BTW: I'll post that banana bread recipe as soon as I get copyright clearance from the cookbook
1 Comments:
At 7:57 PM , Anonymous said...
It is Emily - I completely agree with your comment about the catalog. I never rely on our catalog to find out whether or not we have something in full-text. I don't think we link to anything on PubMed Central but we should.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home